Does What Gabrielle Reece Said Really Set Us Back?

Resource:
Weekend Confidential: Gabrielle Reece
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424127887324715704578481253038630568

Alexandra Wolfeg states Gabrielle Reece, a former model and professianl volleyball player is under great debate on whether her opinion of females being submassive to males has set the human culture to its early stage. The author introduces the difficulties at the begining of Ms. Reece'marriage and sugggests that this could be the reason leads to her choice.According to the author, Ms. Reece is taking a "service-oriented" role at home but still keeping an eye on her own career in fitness industry. The author concludes that even if Ms. Reece's words is strongly controversial it does not stop her from being happy as who she is.

For me, I do not understand how Ms. Reece's opinion can influent the women movement so much that can even draw it back to "being a doormat is a sign of strength". American females still have to follow the husband's family name after marriage. I really do not see how much has been gained since the women movement.

China has abandoned the family name changing custom for a long time. Does it mean our female is much stronger and more independent than our male. I am afraid not. Asian woman are widely known by their soft and gentle behavior pattern before or after marriage. Just like this family name thing, the women movement is a big joke itself. When the ones start to consider themselves a vulnerable group and fight for fairness, they actually start the discremination by puting themselves in a damaged party. There is no meaning to fight to be treated as men, because afterall we are not men.

We are different that is why we are treated differently. That is our nature and it is not necessarily a bad thing. The nature of your body and brain design determines that we female are more suitable to do trival and misellaneous things than men. On the other hand, males are more strong on focusing. Some would say they are sexal discriminated during job hunting. Or is it because that job is acctually not suitable for females at all? If so, why do we bother fighting for some equal job oppotunities on things that we are not really as good as men. Why do not we do something that men can never do. How about staying at home, making best efficiency in house keeping and using the extra time for self developing? Males cannot always do this, not only because they are not good at it(usually ends up in tragedy), but also they have to work like slaves to raise money so we can put on new curtains and renovate the gardon. I do not see any disadvantages and weakness of women here.

Here I want to talk about the efficiency of social functioning. The highest efficiency can only be reached when everyone is at the spot that suits him best. Why would you use a canon to shoot a mosquito? Then, why would you put a female on safe guard?

We are female. We do what men cannot do and we are meant to be protected and babied. I am so proud of this! This is how an independent woman thinking.

Resource:https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjEm38qWJww7p2OukSsr5RWZqyorG8gBNBG7VnJPIAIAPkBLDqwoayRghvwt-g3dg9guo5JJ4cRnlmXtgdvrKY_eLzdVagNBXhfnfcgOAuvOa3nvniGm00fNYFf5vRS96hlTT1fUl0wba8/s640/babies-baby-couple-cute-girl-Favim.com-110637.jpg